European Elections: reform
the “center-right”
Surely, many of you wonder why the "far right" political parties are defeating the traditional "center-right" parties (Christian Democracy).
Ok, let's go to the beginning of the story: "contribution" is a word that does not match what Benito Mussolini did with political theory. Let me think for a minute ... maybe "demolition"... no! got it! : it´s about that process (don´t know the name) by which the less capable builders make their own houses by copying some elements that come from the local cultured architecture.
I do not recommend anyone to visit "Metapedia" (thefar right"Wikipedia") but there, you can find how the political theory of the Sardinian genius Antonio Gramci resembles fascism in the same way that the best Gothic cathedral resembles art "kitsch"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci
So, to find the crossing point of the two lines I want to follow, we need to find two intellectuals of reference, and a point that serves as a milestone in the history of bourgeois politics: that is, without a doubt, the text of the "Constitution of the French Republic ", of 1848, where universal suffrage is established for the first time, as a consequence of the establishment of the concept of" citizen "(male), associated with the set of: house, family, religion and private property. Therefore, we are associating the concept "vote" as a representative unit whose mathematical sum expresses the "popular will", but in a very particular way, since, as we know, in 1848 France had suffered, with the passage of the Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte, the process of cultural unification. Corollary of this exhibition is that, in those states where cultural homogeneity has not developed, it is precisely the "popular will" that defines the different "tribes" or "nations" that form it, and that are cohesive through the rituals, of which the last, definitive and most important is the mortuary, but the most significant is marriage.
We had talked about two reference intellectuals. For the tribe of "anti-capitalists", we have Srećko Horvat, whose talent consists of glimpsing before anyone else the future changes in relation to popular cultural trends: an incredible type.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sre%C4%87ko_Horvat
But, for the "bourgeois" tribe, it is my opinion that whoever answered the question "what to do?" (meanwhile) so that the bourgeois classes (or who aspire to be one day) do not feel disappointed, is the Spanish Iñigo Errejón.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%8D%C3%B1igo_Errej%C3%B3n
Comments
Post a Comment